BN VS PAS : Dulu lain sekarang lain?... Apa yang lainnya?... Jom kita baca dan disini kita akan temui jawapannya... ::.kikiki.::

Dulu : PAS nak buat negara Islam, BN kata tak sesuai kerana Malaysia rakyatnya majmuk.

Sekarang : PAS guna pendekatan "Negara Berkebajikan", BN kata PAS dah lupa "Negara Islam".

Dulu : PAS tak buat pakatan dengan parti bukan Islam, BN kata PAS ekstrimis, anti sosial dan tak relevan.

Sekarang : PAS berkawan dengan DAP, PKR dan ada DHPP, BN kata PAS dah berubah demi kuasa dan PAS dah sesat.

Dulu : PAS hanya didokong oleh Tok Guru, Ulama dan orang kampung, BN kata PAS tak moden, fundamentalis dan parti orang kampung.

Sekarang : PAS didokong oleh ulama, profesional dan teknokrat Islamis, BN kata PAS dah tinggalkan kempimpinan Ulama...

Dulu : Pakatan buat janji nak turunkan harga kereta, bagi air percuma, BN kata negara dan industri akan bankrap.

Sekarang : BN pula tiru manisfeto nak turunkan harga kereta, & bagi air percuma kat Selangor kalau BN menang, maka semua pencacai kata itu yang terbaik dari BN.

#Kesimpulannya, buat salah tak buat salah, jadi UMNO serba salah... Betullah kata orang yang,,,, Zaman ini zaman "Edan" buat UMNO... ::.kikiki.::

do the PAS supporters respect the Constitution?

Article 8 (1 and 2) of the Constitution says all Malaysians must be treated equal. So how can Muslims suffer a different punishment from non-Muslims for crimes they commit? Is this not a violation of the Constitution? And is PAS respecting the Constitution by proposing different punishments for crimes based on your religion? The Constitution says there must be no discrimination based on religion.

PAS requires non-Muslims to pay ‘Islamic’ tax other than income tax. Muslims pay zakat and non-Muslims pay kharaj. Is this not a violation of Article 11(2) of the Constitution?

And u said u fear PAS

Syariah laws comprise of many laws.
The Hudud law, which is a bone of contention to many, is just one of these Syariah laws. Hudud, however, deals with
seven specific crimes. But there are other Islamic laws that deal with inheritance, marriage, and so on.

How can PAS implement Islamic laws if it comes to power in the federal government when it will need a two-thirds majority in
Parliament to do so but it contests only one-third of the 222 seats and wins less than half that?

if PAS wants Islamic laws, and even if PKR agrees to this (which it will not of, course), as long as DAP opposes the idea then it just can't be done.

In Kelantan, the Hindus were offered permission to build a temple even though they had not asked for permission. The biggest Thai temple in Malaysia is in
Kelantan. While Umno says that non-Muslims can't use the word 'Allah', Nik Aziz says they can. During the Umno days,
the Chinese could not slaughter pigs in Kelantan. Now, they can.

PAS was from UMNO

Malaysia Today

around the Merdeka era, Umno suffered another split when those in the religious wing left the party to form the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party or PMIP -- which, today, is known as PAS. In that sense PAS too can be considered an Umno splinter-party.

Islamic Laws

PAS will need 150 seats to amend the Federal Constitution of Malaysia and turn Malaysia into an Islamic State.

in other words,
“PAS NEEDS 150 SEATS IN PARLIAMENT TO CHANGE THE LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY OR OF THE STATES!"

Anyway, 150 seats or no 150 seats, PAS does not intend to introduce Islamic laws, PERIOD.




source: Malaysia Today, Malaysia Today(2)